<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #169  Aperture, iChat screensharing, VirtualBox, Growl annoyances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.podfeet.com/wordpress/2008/09/14/169-aperture-ichat-screensharing-virtualbox-growl-annoyances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.podfeet.com/wordpress/2008/09/14/169-aperture-ichat-screensharing-virtualbox-growl-annoyances/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:53:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: debbie T</title>
		<link>http://www.podfeet.com/wordpress/2008/09/14/169-aperture-ichat-screensharing-virtualbox-growl-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-114515</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 04:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podfeet.com/wordpress/?p=526#comment-114515</guid>
		<description>Yikes, wow, that is a lot of data files, if that is nearly the same as your originals. I am used to my huge 8mb files, so 700kb didn&#039;t seem that bad!!! But it does add up, obviously!

If I am understanding you correctly, if you are saying MOVE, meaning move everything over to a managed Aperture library,  I don&#039;t think that it would save any space. You will still need previews whether you reference files or let Aperture organize them. 

But again, I am not an expert, so there might be something a little extra file space.

I did find an article over at Inside Aperture about consolidating masters.
http://digitalmedia.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/digitalmedia/2007/01/26/a-hitchhikers-guide-to-aperture.html?page=4

Looks like an interesting tool, and also there is the &quot;Manage Referenced Files&quot; tool which could be nice if you move stuff around in error.

Good luck whatever you do! Have a great Sunday, Allison</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes, wow, that is a lot of data files, if that is nearly the same as your originals. I am used to my huge 8mb files, so 700kb didn&#8217;t seem that bad!!! But it does add up, obviously!</p>
<p>If I am understanding you correctly, if you are saying MOVE, meaning move everything over to a managed Aperture library,  I don&#8217;t think that it would save any space. You will still need previews whether you reference files or let Aperture organize them. </p>
<p>But again, I am not an expert, so there might be something a little extra file space.</p>
<p>I did find an article over at Inside Aperture about consolidating masters.<br />
<a href="http://digitalmedia.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/digitalmedia/2007/01/26/a-hitchhikers-guide-to-aperture.html?page=4" rel="nofollow">http://digitalmedia.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/digitalmedia/2007/01/26/a-hitchhikers-guide-to-aperture.html?page=4</a></p>
<p>Looks like an interesting tool, and also there is the &#8220;Manage Referenced Files&#8221; tool which could be nice if you move stuff around in error.</p>
<p>Good luck whatever you do! Have a great Sunday, Allison</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: podfeet</title>
		<link>http://www.podfeet.com/wordpress/2008/09/14/169-aperture-ichat-screensharing-virtualbox-growl-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-114507</link>
		<dc:creator>podfeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 02:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podfeet.com/wordpress/?p=526#comment-114507</guid>
		<description>Gary - I&#039;m trying to let go just like you!  I&#039;m such a control freak though.  I think I could almost do it except iPhoto doesn&#039;t allow sub-folders, and my library of 39,000 photos are carefully arranged into folders and subfolders and events within subfolders, and since iPhoto doesn&#039;t support that I can&#039;t really go along with it.  However, since Aperture DOES support folders and subfolders I could have found the solution.  I will try to be zen with it tho just like you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary &#8211; I&#8217;m trying to let go just like you!  I&#8217;m such a control freak though.  I think I could almost do it except iPhoto doesn&#8217;t allow sub-folders, and my library of 39,000 photos are carefully arranged into folders and subfolders and events within subfolders, and since iPhoto doesn&#8217;t support that I can&#8217;t really go along with it.  However, since Aperture DOES support folders and subfolders I could have found the solution.  I will try to be zen with it tho just like you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: podfeet</title>
		<link>http://www.podfeet.com/wordpress/2008/09/14/169-aperture-ichat-screensharing-virtualbox-growl-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-114503</link>
		<dc:creator>podfeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 01:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podfeet.com/wordpress/?p=526#comment-114503</guid>
		<description>Your math is right - it&#039;s 700kb which is almost a megabyte, which is nearly as big as the original files!  The entire REAL photo library is 48GB, and the thumbnails and previews are 28GB!  I think I&#039;ll have to do a MOVE instead, this makes no sense!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your math is right &#8211; it&#8217;s 700kb which is almost a megabyte, which is nearly as big as the original files!  The entire REAL photo library is 48GB, and the thumbnails and previews are 28GB!  I think I&#8217;ll have to do a MOVE instead, this makes no sense!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie T</title>
		<link>http://www.podfeet.com/wordpress/2008/09/14/169-aperture-ichat-screensharing-virtualbox-growl-annoyances/comment-page-1/#comment-114488</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 23:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.podfeet.com/wordpress/?p=526#comment-114488</guid>
		<description>I got the comment, Allison, so everything is working!

Okay the Facebook plugin, why would you need a browser? Isn&#039;t it just a plugin right inside iPhoto? I am not really a Facebook user, so I don&#039;t know for sure, but I have used the Flickr plugin(s) and it only asks me to use a browser to authorize the plugin from inside my Flickr account  (oh maybe that&#039;s what you mean!) 

28gb of data? That is a lot! wow!!  But I suppose if you break it down, and I am not sure I am doing this correctly, but that would be .71mb of data for each file. So what, is that about 700kb? Again, my math might be fuzzy, I am rushing...but that doesn&#039;t sound too bad once you break it down.

I still haven&#039;t listened to your Demo show, but I am looking forward to the new show tomorrow. I keep forgetting to check you out live. But it&#039;s like 8pm my time, and that is cutting into TV time. LOL haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the comment, Allison, so everything is working!</p>
<p>Okay the Facebook plugin, why would you need a browser? Isn&#8217;t it just a plugin right inside iPhoto? I am not really a Facebook user, so I don&#8217;t know for sure, but I have used the Flickr plugin(s) and it only asks me to use a browser to authorize the plugin from inside my Flickr account  (oh maybe that&#8217;s what you mean!) </p>
<p>28gb of data? That is a lot! wow!!  But I suppose if you break it down, and I am not sure I am doing this correctly, but that would be .71mb of data for each file. So what, is that about 700kb? Again, my math might be fuzzy, I am rushing&#8230;but that doesn&#8217;t sound too bad once you break it down.</p>
<p>I still haven&#8217;t listened to your Demo show, but I am looking forward to the new show tomorrow. I keep forgetting to check you out live. But it&#8217;s like 8pm my time, and that is cutting into TV time. LOL haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
