{"id":33207,"date":"2025-05-25T15:56:51","date_gmt":"2025-05-25T22:56:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/?p=33207"},"modified":"2025-05-25T16:24:41","modified_gmt":"2025-05-25T23:24:41","slug":"sd-card-speeds-how-fast-are-they-really","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/2025\/05\/sd-card-speeds-how-fast-are-they-really\/","title":{"rendered":"SD Card Speeds \u2014 How Fast Are They Really?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Early in 2025, my new DSLR camera arrived. It\u2019s a Pentax K-3 III and it\u2019s outstanding. One of the features it has that improves over my earlier Pentax KP is a UHS-II high speed SDXC memory card slot. Faster sounds better, so I thought I\u2019d buy a faster SD card. Should be easy, right?<\/p>\n

The card I initially focused on was the SanDisk Extreme PRO 300 MB\/s SDXC C10 V60 U3 UHS-II 128 GB. Clearly the best one for the task, right? OK, I need to be able to decipher that soup of letters and numbers to know what I am getting. Let\u2019s find out about what we collectively call \u201cSD cards\u201d.<\/p>\n

First, there are three completely independent classifications in play \u2014 the physical size, the capacity class, and the speed class. Let\u2019s first look at physical size.<\/p>\n

The original SD card was introduced in 1999 and is about the size of a postage stamp. Kids, ask your parents. With the advent of smaller and smaller electronic devices, this was too big for many. A slightly smaller miniSD form was introduced in 2003 targeted at mobile phones but only a year later the tiny MicroSD was launched. It measures slightly less than half the dimensions of the original. MicroSD has become very popular in phones, as well as small consumer electronics devices. Also in any small crevice where you might drop one.<\/p>\n

Next comes the capacity class. The original SD card standard maxed out at 2 GB. I recently found an old card in a box that was 8 MB! That\u2019s not even enough for one<\/em> RAW photo on my camera! As time and technology marched on, the 2 GB barrier needed to be raised. Enter SDHC in 2006. The HC stands for High Capacity. This raised the limit to 32 GB. It is also worth noting that the smallest<\/em> size of SDHC was 2 GB.<\/p>\n

In 2009, the capacity was increased again. The SDXC \u2014 eXtended Capacity \u2014 standard encompasses 32 GB up to a whopping 2 TB. Who\u2019d need more than that on a single card, right? In 2018, SDUC \u2014 Ultra Capacity \u2014 was introduced. It starts at 2 TB and tops out at an astonishing 128 TB. SDUC is a nascent format, with the world\u2019s first 4 TB card due for release in 2025. For my camera, that\u2019s enough space for over 64,000 photos in RAW format \u2014 more than I have amassed in 20 years of digital photography \u2014 or 168,000 JPEGs.<\/p>\n

OK, that\u2019s the easy stuff covered. There are different physical sizes and different logical sizes. miniSD is rare, in my experience, but you can generally get the HC or XC capacities in either SD or MicroSD size.<\/p>\n

So that just leaves speed \u2014 the bit I was really trying to find out about. Buckle in.<\/p>\n

The first wrinkle we have to deal with is that there are four<\/em> speeds to consider. Minimum and maximum write speed, and minimum and maximum read speed. For the most part, minimum read speed is not talked about, so, yay, we only have to worry about three. Except\u2026 we also have to deal with three different ways of classifying speed!<\/p>\n

The early cards had a \u201cspeed class\u201d. These are marked on the cards as a number enclosed by a large letter C \u2014 essentially a circle with the right side cut out. These speeds were one of 2, 4, 6, or 10 MB\/s and denoted a minimum write speed<\/em>. In 2025, you\u2019ll be unlikely to find a new card that has anything besides C10, as few modern devices will even operate at lower speeds.<\/p>\n

Next came the UHS speed class. This is denoted on cards as a number enclosed in a stylised letter U. It looks like the symbology for a beaker you might find in a science lab. There are only two UHS speed classes. U1 is 10 MB\/s, the same as C10, and U3 is 30 MB\/s. Again, these are minimum write speeds.<\/p>\n

But wait\u2026 progress demands change, right? More recently introduced is the Video Speed Class, so called as it was introduced to satisfy those shooting 4K video. This is represented on cards as a slightly stylised letter V followed by a number. One of 6, 10, 30, 60 or 90. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the number is the same measure as for UHS speed class \u2014 Megabytes per second. I find it curious that V6 exists, where the U numbers did not cover the 6 MB\/s speed.<\/p>\n

Video Speed Class is the standard currently in use, but there is an Express Speed Class already defined. This is represented as a capital E followed by a number that is one of 150, 300, 450, or 600. These will all outperform V90, as the number is again Megabytes per second.<\/p>\n

Note that everything I have described so far is minimum write speeds. It is, after all, the speed that matters most. You want your photos, video, audio, or whatever to be written to the card quickly so you don\u2019t miss what\u2019s coming next.<\/p>\n

What about read speeds or maximum write speeds? There are no standards for these, so card manufacturers put whatever they want on their cards. This<\/em> is where you can easily be misled. I tested a V30 card which claimed 200 MB\/s on it. If you only see one such speed on a card, that will almost certainly be the maximum read speed, which is often the highest speed the card can attain in any operation. But note it is the highest<\/em> speed, not a sustained<\/em> speed. My tests showed the sustained read speed was around 90 MB\/s and the write speed 70 MB\/s. There is no doubt something to be said for understanding the test methodology and equipment, but it does clearly show that real speed may differ substantially from claims. Newer SDXC cards may show both a read and write speed on them. Again, these are claimed maximums, not an indication of real-world performance.<\/p>\n

So back to my chosen card, the SanDisk Extreme PRO 300 MB\/s SDXC C10 V60 U3 UHS-II 128 GB. Now we know what most<\/em> of that soup means. 300 MB\/s is the claimed maximum read speed. SDXC is logical because of the capacity; 128 GB. We can also see that some of it is redundant. C10 is a minimum write speed of 10 MB\/s, U3 is a minimum write speed of 30 MB\/s, and V60 is a minimum write speed of 60 MB\/s. The C and U numbers are eclipsed by the V number. The only reason they are still there, I believe, is because some equipment manuals still refer to the old standards.<\/p>\n

But hang on\u2026 I said my camera has a UHS-II card slot, and this is reflected in the card name, too. What does UHS-II mean? Whoops, did I miss out a speed class? Not really.<\/p>\n

Whatever the claims on the cards, the standards have maximum theoretical speeds based on the electrical design. The original SD cards maxed out at 25 MB\/s. All standards from SDHC onwards have access to UHS design speeds. UHS-I raises the limit to 104 MB\/s, UHS-II is 312 MB\/s, UHS-III is 624 MB\/s. Finally, because what\u2019s a standard if you don\u2019t change names mid-stream, SD Express tops out at an eye watering 3,940 MB\/s. Of these, UHS-II is the current state of the art. Many devices are still UHS-I, but UHS-III and SD Express are still not really a thing.<\/p>\n

Incidentally, if you have a Mac Studio, MacBook Pro introduced in 2021 or later, iMac introduced in 2020, or a Mac Pro, then you have a UHS-II reader built in.<\/p>\n

So, do I need a UHS-II card? It comes down to this: the electrical design allows for<\/em> three times the data rate of UHS-I, regardless of the other factors. But the V class says what I am guaranteed<\/em> to get. Obviously, real-world use depends on the device, but there\u2019s one more measure we can use to get a feel for this. Price.<\/p>\n

Using 128 GB SDXC as the basis, and in New Zealand dollars from a local photographic retailer, a UHS-I V30 costs $59, a UHS-II V60 costs $129, and a UHS-II V90 costs $279.<\/p>\n

Did you notice that the first card was UHS-I and the other two were UHS-II? It appears that, at least in the SanDisk range, a V30 card will be UHS-I and a V60 or V90 card will be UHS-II. From this, we can infer that a V60 or greater card would be pointless in a UHS-I device. In my camera, for maximum performance, I should choose between V60 and V90. Given the V90 is just over twice the price, I think the V60 seems like the sweet spot. Or is it?<\/p>\n

We need to consider maximum versus real-world speeds. A card from a reputable manufacturer should live up to the minimum claims, based on the C, U, or V number, but the maximum attainable in use will vary by use case. Importantly, those claimed maximums are generally given for sequential<\/em> operations. If your device is not doing sequential reads or writes, the speed will drop dramatically. Reading and writing at the same time will also reduce speeds.<\/p>\n

Earlier, I mentioned my test results of 90 MB\/s read and 70 MB\/s write. For testing, I found an app on the App Store which specifically tests SD cards, and includes several modes of reading and writing. More on that in as bit. By the way, if you\u2019re familiar with BlackMagic Disk Speed Test, that only does one type of reads and writes which is, apparently, not fully reflective of typical use for devices using SD cards.<\/p>\n

\"AmorphousDiskMark
Real world speeds measured on my MacBook Pro for a card that claims 200 MB\/s on its label. Even the sequential read speed doesn\u2019t make half way.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The single-threaded, sequential write speed of my V30 card measured 72.81 MB\/s. That\u2019s a healthy margin over the claimed minimum of 30. Good so far. The single-threaded sequential read speed measured 93.29 MB\/s. Under half<\/em> the claim on the label. Now the label is a maximum<\/em> speed, but for the real-world test to be less than half, I think they\u2019re stretching credibility.<\/p>\n

But wait\u2026 am I using a UHS-I or UHS-II reader? My M4 Pro MacBook Pro\u2019s built-in port is UHS-II so it should not be a bottleneck. It got me to wondering what speeds I would get with the Apple USB-C SDXC card reader I bought for my old M1 MacBook Pro? I\u2019m fairly sure this is also a UHS-II reader, but the stats on the old card were woeful, with the highest of the figures being a paltry 44.42 MB\/s.<\/p>\n

At this point, I started looking more closely at the new card I had chosen. The V60 card actually shows both a read maximum of 280 MB\/s and a write maximum of 100 MB\/s. For twice the price of my old one. But I\u2019m already getting 72 MB\/s write, so is it really worth it?<\/p>\n

This was turning into a real minefield. Would I just have to buy the V60 and see how it performs? It seems like an expensive way to go. What I really need is for someone else to have done all the work. So I searched for SD card speed tests, and I hit pay dirt. I found a site called Have Camera, Will Travel by David Coleman, and a page titled \u201cFastest SD Cards \u2013 Real Speed Test Results \/ 2025<\/a>\u201d.<\/p>\n

David\u2019s page makes interesting reading as he explains what he\u2019s doing, how he\u2019s doing it, and why. He also explains what software he uses \u2014 on a Mac \u2014 to do the tests. It\u2019s the same one I had found on the Mac App Store, called AmorphousDiskMark<\/a>. It\u2019s free and simple to use.<\/p>\n

One intriguing point on David\u2019s page is he said he had variable results depending on the reader he used. Since 2016 he has been doing measurements of SD cards, using an external reader, and publishing the results. I found what I believe to be my old card, and he declares he gets a write speed of 102.4 MB\/s and a read speed of 180.3 MB\/s \u2014 substantially more than I get. I would have hoped that Apple\u2019s own UHS-II internal reader would get the fastest rates, but apparently not. David\u2019s Mac has one, and he doesn\u2019t use it.<\/p>\n

The most useful part of David\u2019s list, however, and he points this out, is that whatever your equipment, he has comparisons of all the cards he has tested on the same high-performance equipment. Assuming my camera is high performing equipment, I can make a judgement on my new card.<\/p>\n

So how do the SanDisk cards fare? The V30 I already have scored 102 and 180 \u2014 a very respectable result compared to the claim of 200 MB\/s. The V60 is not listed, and this is where it gets interesting. He has a card which is U3 and UHS-II, and he lists the claimed<\/em> speeds as 260 and 300 (though achieving nowhere near that in real performance). The V60 card I am looking at on vendor sites claims 100 and 280. Clearly, SanDisk are iterating on these products, making it even more complicated. David lists a V90 with a claimed 300\/300 speed, and this achieves an impressive 306 and 304. David ranks this card as the current one to beat. He says:<\/p>\n

Combined with SanDisk\u2019s strong support network, wide availability, and competitive pricing, this card looks to be a winner.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

He also says:<\/p>\n

Something to watch out for, though, is that there are multiple cards that carry the Extreme Pro name.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

No kidding. I checked my preferred retailer and the V90 card listed does not match David\u2019s description. Sigh. I am guessing, from what I have seen, that the SanDisk Extreme Pro cards that list both speeds on the card label are the newest and likely to meet or exceed their claims.<\/p>\n

\"Two
My old V30 card alongside the new V90 card. Except for the necessary classification differences, it seems like every element of the label has been cosmetically changed \u2014 a different font style or size or weight.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

B&H Photo have two<\/em> versions of the V90 card with pictures that bear out the descriptions David gave. The V90 with a single claimed speed printed on it retails for $109. The one with both claimed speeds is $129 and bears the label \u201cNew Arrival\u201d.<\/p>\n

So my final determination is that the V60 card is likely faster than my V30, but the latest V90 is state of the art. I also read somewhere, before I started any of this detailed research, that no-one needs anything more than a V30 card in a Pentax K-3 III for stills photography. So you know what I did, right?<\/p>\n

I generally recommend buying from B&H for two reasons. First, they have long-established trust in the photographic community. You\u2019ll get what you see, not a knock-off. Second, they have fair prices. I asked the B&H site to estimate the cost to me in NZD, and it came to $374.64. Looking at local prices of the older, cheaper version of the card, they range from $169 to $519! The crazy part is that the B&H estimate includes a rather hefty shipping cost of $111.24. Ultimately, I trusted in Amazon for AUD$201 plus shipping that is a lot<\/em> less than B&H would charge, even though it ships from Amazon USA.<\/p>\n

Oh, you want to know my test results of the new card? It claims 300 MB\/s read and write.<\/p>\n

The single-threaded, sequential write speed is over three times as fast as my old card at 223.90 MB\/s. The single-threaded, sequential read speed is over twice as fast at 204.95. These are the most important speed measures, so it\u2019s good to see such dramatic increases. All of the other measures are greater, but by lesser factors, ranging from 12% faster on single-threaded random reads, to 73% faster on multi-threaded sequential writes.<\/p>\n

\"AmorphousDiskMark
The all important single-threaded sequential write speed is over three times as fast. The next most important, single-threaded sequential read, is over twice as fast.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Money well spent? It\u2019s likely any other card would not perform as well as this one, so I think yes. Certainly when I am importing my photos from the card into Lightroom, it is visibly much faster than with the old card. I\u2019m calling it a win.<\/p>\n

Believe it or not, there is even more to the SD speed story than I have covered. There are other classifications and speeds that have been used, but what I have described is the standard as it has come to be used in the mainstream. One speed measure was the \u201cx\u201d speed, expressed for example as 100x, which relates to the speed of CD-ROM drives!<\/p>\n

The final take-away is this: If your modern device supports only UHS-I, then your best bet is a U3\/V30. If it supports UHS-II, then you may decide on V60 or V90, but V30 is probably perfectly fine unless you\u2019re recording 8K video. The only way to know what you\u2019ll really get is to read reviews from people like David, or by using your device with the card.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Early in 2025, my new DSLR camera arrived. It\u2019s a Pentax K-3 III and it\u2019s outstanding. One of the features it has that improves over my earlier Pentax KP is a UHS-II high speed SDXC memory card slot. Faster sounds better, so I thought I\u2019d buy a faster SD card. Should be easy, right? The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":33209,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[147],"tags":[96,492,3280,6619,3281,3282,523,6973],"class_list":["post-33207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog-posts","tag-photography","tag-portable-data-storage","tag-sd","tag-sd-card-reader","tag-sdhc","tag-sdxc","tag-storage","tag-storage-devices"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/IMG_6200.jpeg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33207"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33207\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33881,"href":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33207\/revisions\/33881"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33209"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.podfeet.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}